After same-sex “marriage”, what’s next? Perhaps the lesbian “throuple” with sperm-donated in-vitro kids?

article-2611020-1D4893AC00000578-65_634x545As US Chief Justice John Roberts has pointed out in his Dissent to the Supreme Court’s unbelievably ill-founded judgment on same-sex “marriage”, there is no principled argument in that judgment to prevent three persons or more from “marrying”. If “through (marriage’s) enduring bond, two persons together can find other freedoms, such as expression, intimacy, and spirituality”, there seems to be no reason why a group of three persons might be prevented from doing the same…

Quod erat demonstrandum. The lesbian “throuple” in the Daily Mail’s report comes from Massachusetts, the first US State that (through a judicial putsch, of course…) has legalized same-sex “marriage”. And of course they can take comfort in the fact that the US Supreme Court’s majority routinely uses the big lie, speaking of same-sex “parents” and “their” children, as if they did not know that each child has a father and a mother.

Supposedly, European Commission Vice-President Frans Timmermans, when hearing of this newest type of “family”, will tell us that all EU Member States “should have the decency to respect the decision of other countries to have same sex-marriage recognised – all that children need are loving parents, ang who gives a damn if such parents are a group of three lesbians?”