Social scientists who present evidence that the behaviors of sexual liberation are not harmful—in same-sex parenting research, this is couched as “no differences” from heterosexual parents in child well-being—do not merely claim that their conclusions are strong while contrary findings are weak. Instead, they claim that their conclusions are the only permissible ones, while contrary findings are necessarily unscientific. In their minds, contrary evidence either does not exist, or it must reflect pseudo-scientific bias.
In his meticulously researched new book, Same-Sex Parenting Research: A Critical Assessment, Walter Schumm, Professor of Family Studies at Kansas State University, turns this scenario on its head. Continue reading “New Book shows how LGBT-agenda is based on fake “science””
At last. The last edition of the so-called “Life Ball” in Vienna will take place on 8 June, and that will be the end of it. Good riddance.
Despite its name (which in fact evidences once more the tendency of cultural revolutionaries to manipulate language to such an extent that black becomes white and white becomes black), the Life Ball was actually a gruesome self-exhibition of the Culture of Death with all its decadence, insanity, and filth. And of course it was, contrary to the organisers’ pretensions, by no means a “charity event”. As one has read in the newspapers these days, it paid out around 30 million Euro for “charity purposes” over a period of 27 years, which was far less than the public subsidies that were poured into it by the government of the City of Vienna alone. The true reason for the city to sponsor the event was that it attracted a host of wealthy sodomites to visit the city and spend on average 600 Euro on the ball event as well as in local hotels, brothels, and other venues. The annual direct subsidy was 900K Euro; in addition, the city allowed the orgy to take place in the town hall and on the town hall square without requesting any payment – an additional advantage worth an estimated 180K Euro. Continue reading “After the Ball (some background info on the Vienna “Life Ball”)”
The UK Supreme Court has unanimously decided that the refusal to bake a cake with the message “Support Gay Marriage” on it cannot be qualified as “discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation”.
The judges emphasized the importance of the right to freedom from forced speech, pointing out that “the rights to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, and to freedom of expression … include the right not to be obliged to manifest beliefs one does not hold…”. Continue reading “UK Supreme Court: no obligation to bake cake with pro-sodomy-propaganda”
Thomas Neuwirth, the Austrian singer starlet (and Eurovision winner) known under his pseudonym “Conchita Wurst”, has informed the public that “since many years” he is HIV-positive. With this coming out, he is reacting to a blackmail by one of his sodomite “ex-friends”, choosing to make the fact known before the blackmailer did. Once again we are catching a rather nasty glimpse of what “friendship” must be like in the LGBT community.
While any attempt at blackmailing must be firmly rejected, it nevertheless should be noted that in Neuwirth’s case there is a legitimate interest of the wider public to be informed. Being a carrier of HIV-infection may be an entirely private matter for everyone else, but it is not in the case of Conchita, given that he/she is publicly promoting and advertising the very lifestyle that carries an extremely high risk of HIV-infection.
Not that in itself Mr. Neuwirth’s HIV-infection had any claim to newsworthiness. In fact, who would ever have expected otherwise? But it is intellectually dishonest and grossly irresponsible to promote the LGBT-lifestyle and keep silent about the risks and consequences. Therefore it is good that the illusion that sodomy is risk-free and “normal” has once again – just as in so many other cases – been debunked.
Neuwirth hastes to reassure the public that thanks to the treatment he is receiving, he has a very low prevalence of HIV in his blood, “nearly below the threshold of detectability”. Apparently he is still on the lookout for persons to have sex with. If anyone catches the infection, the public health system is expected to take care.
According to a report in the Austrian newspaper “Der Standard”, the radical Feminist agenda promoted by the European Parliament’s ultra-radical FEMM committee is meeting increasing resistance from EU citizens – remarkably strong resistance indeed, given that average Europeans usually do not care too much about what is going on inside the EP.
Austrian MEP Angelica Mlinar, Member of the “liberal” (in fact rabidly intolerant)ALDE group, is reported as saying that the FEMM Committee gets between 5000 and 6000 unsolicited letters every month from European citizens, asking it to stop pushing its radical “Anti-Discrimination”-, Feminist, and “LGBT” agendas.
(That must be when there are no petitions by CitizenGo are going on…)
The Radicals however do not intend to refrain from acting against the electorate’s will.
It takes little to draw the ire of the LGBT-lobby. The European-Commission-financed pro-sodomy pressure group ILGA Europe has announced on its website that it is “deeply concerned” by “reported homo- and transphobic publications and statements” of the newly elected Spanish ECtHR judge, María Elósegui Itxaso. And one of the lobby’s most active minions in the European Parliament, Juan Fernando Lopez Aguilar, a Spanish Member of the European Parliament’s S&D Group, is making himself busy with collecting signatures of his fellow MEPs to protest against Mrs. Elósegui’s appointment. Continue reading “The LGBT lobby’s nasty campaign against a newly appointed ECtHR judge”